Asymmetry of single cells and where that leads.

Most single animal cells have an internal vector that determines where recycling membrane is added to the cell's surface. Because of the specific molecular composition of this added membrane, a dynamic asymmetry is formed on the surface of the cell. The consequences of this dynamic asymmetry are discussed, together with what they imply for how cells move. The polarity of a single-celled embryo, such as that of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, is explored in a similar framework.

How do amoebae swim and crawl?

The surface behaviour of swimming amoebae was followed in cells bearing a cAR1-paGFP (cyclic AMP receptor fused to a photoactivatable-GFP) construct. Sensitized amoebae were placed in a buoyant medium where they could swim toward a chemoattractant cAMP source. paGFP, activated at the cell's front, remained fairly stationary in the cell's frame as the cell advanced; the label was not swept rearwards. Similar experiments with chemotaxing cells attached to a substratum gave the same result. Furthermore, if the region around a lateral projection near a crawling cell's front is marked, the projection and the labelled cAR1 behave differently. The label spreads by diffusion but otherwise remains stationary in the cell's frame; the lateral projection moves rearwards on the cell (remaining stationary with respect to the substrate), so that it ends up outside the labelled region. Furthermore, as cAR1-GFP cells move, they occasionally do so in a remarkably straight line; this suggests they do not need to snake to move on a substratum. Previously, we suggested that the surface membrane of a moving amoeba flows from front to rear as part of a polarised membrane trafficking cycle. This could explain how swimming amoebae are able to exert a force against the medium. Our present results indicate that, in amoebae, the suggested surface flow does not exist: this implies that they swim by shape changes.

The exocytic gene secA is required for Dictyostelium cell motility and osmoregulation.

We investigated the link between cell movement and plasma membrane recycling using a fast-acting, temperature-sensitive mutant of the Dictyostelium SecA exocytic protein. Strikingly, most mutant cells become almost paralysed within minutes at the restrictive temperature. However, they can still sense cyclic-AMP (cAMP) gradients and polymerise actin up-gradient, but form only abortive pseudopodia, which cannot expand. They also relay a cAMP signal normally, suggesting that cAMP is released by a non-exocytic mechanism. To investigate why SecA is required for motility, we examined membrane trafficking in the mutant. Plasma membrane circulation is rapidly inhibited at the restrictive temperature and the cells acquire a prominent vesicle. Organelle-specific markers show that this is an undischarged contractile vacuole, and we found the cells are correspondingly osmo-sensitive. Electron microscopy shows that many smaller vesicles, probably originating from the plasma membrane, also accumulate at the restrictive temperature. Consistent with this, the surface area of mutant cells shrinks. We suggest that SecA mutant cells cannot move at the restrictive temperature because their block in exocytosis results in a net uptake of plasma membrane, reducing its area, and so restricting pseudopodial expansion. This demonstrates the importance of proper surface area regulation in cell movement.

Dictyostelium amoebae and neutrophils can swim.

Animal cells migrating over a substratum crawl in amoeboid fashion; how the force against the substratum is achieved remains uncertain. We find that amoebae and neutrophils, cells traditionally used to study cell migration on a solid surface, move toward a chemotactic source while suspended in solution. They can swim and do so with speeds similar to those on a solid substrate. Based on the surprisingly rapidly changing shape of amoebae as they swim and earlier theoretical schemes for how suspended microorganisms can migrate (Purcell EM (1977) Life at low Reynolds number. Am J Phys 45:3-11), we suggest the general features these cells use to gain traction with the medium. This motion requires either the movement of the cell's surface from the cell's front toward its rear or protrusions that move down the length of the elongated cell. Our results indicate that a solid substratum is not a prerequisite for these cells to produce a forward thrust during movement and suggest that crawling and swimming are similar processes, a comparison we think is helpful in understanding how cells migrate.

On the shape of migrating cells--a 'front-to-back' model.

The wide range of shapes that are seen in stationary animal cells is believed to be the result of an interplay between giant filamentous complexes--largely the microfilaments and microtubules--although how this is achieved is unknown. In a migrating cell these large elements are also important, but here I suggest an additional factor: the cell surface distribution of those molecules that attach the cell to the substratum. As an animal cell advances, the attachments it makes with the substratum necessarily move backwards with respect to the cell. A fresh supply of these attachments--usually integrin molecules--is required at the cell front so that new attachments can be made. This supply is believed to be provided by the endocytic cycle, which enables the collection of integrins and other molecules from elsewhere on the surface of the cell to be recirculated to the front end of the cell. The rate at which a particular integrin cycles will determine its distribution on the ventral surface of the cell and this, in turn, might help to determine the shape of the cell. I also propose that adhesion molecules that have a slow rate of cycling will produce a flattish phenotype, as seen in fibroblasts, whereas a more rapid cycling will lead to a more snail-like shape. In addition, this model suggests why membrane ruffling occurs and that large non-circulating surface molecules move towards the back of the cell where they might assist in detaching the back end of the cell.

Recap on cell migration.

Most animal cells move cross-linked surface antigens to one pole of the cell, a phenomenon called 'capping'. It is closely related to the rearward movement of particles attached to their surface. Cap formation is one of the most accessible dynamic properties of cells and is closely related to how they move. Yet, how this occurs is unknown.

Using single loxP sites to enhance homologous recombination: ts mutants in Sec1 of Dictyostelium discoideum.

BACKGROUND: Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae are haploid and, as they share many features with animal cells, should be an ideal creature for studying basic processes such as cell locomotion. Isolation of mutants in this amoeba has largely been limited to non-essential genes: nsfA-the gene for NEM-sensitive factor-remains the only essential gene for which conditional (ts) mutants exist. These ts mutants were generated by gene replacement using a library of mutagenised nsfA containing a selectable marker: transformants were then screened for temperature sensitivity. The success of this approach depended on the high level of homologous recombination prevailing at this locus: approximately 95% of selected clones were homologous recombinants. This is unusually high for Dictyostelium: homologous recombination at other loci is usually much less, usually between 0-30%, making the isolation of ts mutants much more tedious. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In trying to make ts mutants in sec1A, homologous recombination was found to be only approximately 25%. A new approach, involving single loxP sites, was investigated. LoxP sites are 34 bp sequences recognised by Cre recombinase and between which this enzyme catalyses recombination. A Dictyostelium line containing a single loxP site adjacent to the 3' end of the sec1A gene was engineered. A sec1A replacement DNA also containing a single loxP site in a homologous position was then introduced into this cell line. In the presence of CRE recombinase, homologous recombination increased to approximately 80% at this locus, presumably largely driven by intermolecular recombination between the two single loxP sites. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: A route to increase the rate of homologous recombination at a specific locus, sec1A, is described which enabled the isolation of 30 ts mutants in sec1A. One of these, sec1Ats1,has been studied and found to cease moving at the restrictive temperature. The approach described here may be valuable for enhancing homologous recombination at specified loci and thus for introducing mutations into specific genes in Dictyostelium and other creatures.

Cell polarity and locomotion, as well as endocytosis, depend on NSF.

NEM-sensitive factor (NSF) is an essential protein required during membrane transport. We replaced part of the endogenous D. discoideum NSF gene (nsfA) by a PCR-mutagenised library and isolated 11 mutants temperature-sensitive (ts) for growth. Two of these have been studied in detail. As expected, both are ts for FITC-dextran uptake by macropinocytosis, for internalising their surface membrane (monitored with FM1-43) and for phagocytosis. However, after 10-20 minutes at 28 degrees C, they round up and cease to chemotax, move or cap ConA receptors. They fully recover when returned to 22 degrees C. These cells carry out a normal 'cringe' reaction in response to cAMP, indicating that the actin cytoskeleton and this signal transduction pathway are still functional at 28 degrees C. The behaviour of these mutants shows that NSF-catalysed processes are required not only for the different endocytic cycles but also for the maintenance of cell polarity. As cell locomotion depends on a cell having a polarity, the mutants stop moving at high temperature. A tentative model is proposed to explain the surprising link between membrane recycling and cell polarity revealed here.